Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Retraction

That wasn't Mrs. Weirsdo in the previous article

4 comments:

Lyanne Sakks said...

You didn't get the print quite small enough, Dusty. Here at the Crappy Times we print retractions that can only be seen under a 666X microscope.

weirsdo said...

This is a first, Dusty! Or have you been kidnapped in a newspaper coup?

Dusty Doggy said...

Come to think of it, I do feel sort of cooped up.

ariel said...

ROTFL!